![]() ![]() Philipp Wesche’s dissertation consists of four papers (all open access): The discussion further added the dynamics between the local level and global law, and barriers to access justice. Whereas Miriam looked at due diligence and transnational legal avenues. Furthermore, she spoke about the different opportunities in business and constitutional law. Maria focused on litigation and the scope of concepts such as remedies and damage. The fourth and last panel consisted of Tamara Horbachevska (Wageningen University & Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, chair), Maria Carolina Olarte (Universidad de los Andes) and Miriam Saage-Maaß (European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights). Access to justice for human rights defenders and community leaders in conflict-affected areas If current rights are often violated, is it not better to focus on enforcing these rights instead of adding new rights? The discussion elaborated on this and questioned whether too much emphasis is put on nature rights. Jonathan took a legal viewpoint and discussed whether or not nature (e.g., rivers) should have legal standing. ![]() Marie talked about the rights of nature and how the West perceives indigenous relations to nature. The third panel consisted of Ximena Arenas (Tilburg University, chair), Jonathan Verschuuren (Tilburg University) and Marie Petersmann (Tilburg University). Rights of nature, indigenous communities and environmental justice ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |